Acoustic archaeology; really?
I’ve been
involved with music much of my life, playing my violin at gatherings such as
weddings and funerals, for a while in a country square-dance band, and for six
years in a group we called Cold Biscuit at all kinds of functions. It’s been fun and has earned extra money.
I love most kinds of music and often listen through
headphones as I’m writing fiction at my computer. My favorite piece is Beethoven’s hauntingly
beautiful “Moonlight Sonata.” I even laboriously
taught myself to play it on the piano over a month, although I’m no pianist. I’ve listened to several accomplished pianists
doing the piece and found each to be slightly different in style, this note
progression played a bit faster or slower than others play it, that few bars
played more loudly or softly, a note held a bit longer or not held quite as
long. Overall, this makes perceptible
differences in how the piece sounds and thus subtle differences in how it
affects me. And that, in turn, got me
thinking, just how, exactly, did the genius
Beethoven himself play it?
It seems only logical that we can never know.
Or can
we?
There is a fringe scientific field called
acoustic archaeology. It explores the
possibility that we can retrieve sounds from the past. This seems ridiculous at first, but the idea
grows on you when you think a bit deeper.
Early recordings were captured on wax
cylinders by a stylus that vibrated in sync with sound input and in so doing incised
indentations in the wax. The sounds
could be retrieved when a playback needle was drawn across those indentations
at the same speed and the resultant sound amplified through a megaphone. This was the essence of the early twentieth-century
wind-up Victrola and the sound was not great, although it seemed astonishing in
its time. That same basic principle, greatly
refined, still works with vinyl records, which are making a surprise comeback,
and with superb fidelity.
Columnist
David Jones claimed in 1982 that sound waves will vibrate a metal trowel as they
impinge on it, so if a plasterer happens to be singing lustily as he works, the
trowel should create tiny ripples in the wet plaster, and if those ripples,
when dried, could be read by a sophisticated-enough device (a laser?) at least
parts of the worker’s song ought to be reproducible.
Serious scientists are studying other ways
old and even ancient sounds might be recovered.
One claimed to have retrieved the hum of a potter’s wheel by electromechanically
reading the grooves in a pot cast on that wheel, for example. Still deeper thinking posits that sound might subtly
change a room’s very molecular structure in a faint but retrievable way through
some future high tech.
I was
writing this post when a related article popped up in the news. Egyptian Karnak priest Nesyamun died 3,000
years ago, but his mummified remains, which even survived the Nazi Blitz, are
in remarkably good condition. His dying
wish was that he be allowed to speak in the afterlife so he could petition the
gods for admission to eternity. A team
of scientists from Royal Holloway, London U., York U., and the Leeds Museum, CT
scanned the old guy’s vocal tract, 3D printed it, and produced a sound through
the printed replica, the first step in possibly reproducing words and even
sentences from this priest who has not been heard for thirty centuries. They
even have hieroglyphics incised on his coffin so they can perhaps have him say
what he hoped to in the afterlife. File that
away in your weird folder.
Meanwhile,
if Beethoven ever happened to practice his “Moonlight Sonata” in an otherwise
quiet church, say, which was being plastered at the time . . .
Phil
www.philbowie.com
For
some absorbing pandemic reading, try the thriller novel series Guns, Diamondback,
Kllrs, and Deathsman, set in the misty folds of the Great Smokies
and endorsed by top gun bestselling authors Lee Child, Ridley Pearson, and Stephen
Coonts. Available in print or Kindle from Amazon. Money back if you don’t like them.